<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Daily Options Report - Latest Comments in Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://daily-options-report.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://daily-options-report.disqus.com/mourning_volatility/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:17:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13129346</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I'm not sure, but I believe there is an automatic delivery. Shorts don't pair with a long, like with an option, so there's no reason a short will not get forced to deliver the shares.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At least that's my understanding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:17:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13119446</link><description>&lt;p&gt; This is a subject I;ve tried to get a handle on for years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The prefs were available to short.  Seems too good to be true, but I dont think theres an 'automatic' deliver of the conversion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; This is where it pays to be hooked into a house like GS, who knows such things.   Maybe you can ask around and get a straight answer. In any case, the swings in the prefs todays were insane. Clearly , an inefficient market, and this is not an isolated case.  Preferred shares do crazy stuff all the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Procol</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:33:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13119085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes, we're safe now!!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...OK, as to shorting ahead of tender, not sure that actually works in that don't you have to deliver the shares regardless? In other words, I don't believe it's like being short calls and hoping they don't get exercised.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13118876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Or combine vertical spreads with calendar spreads to create the double diagonal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/ny9lt6" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/ny9lt6"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/ny9lt6&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkWolfinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:21:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13118591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you're right, I finally saw these went ex today. so anyone who didn't tender is SOL,  they won't get paid divs anymore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the trust preferreds are all trading down in sympathy. but these continue to pay divs, yielding around 10.5%. C-PRR, C-PRS etc. decent return if they climb back toward par and the divs continue. risky of course but with the govt in control of C what can possibly go wrong??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anysunday</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:15:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13118299</link><description>&lt;p&gt; wow. I just noticed the C prefs bungee jump.  Ok.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; I believe its too late to buy for tender. So these are trading EX TENDER.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Thing is, could you have simply shorted yesterday and banked?  I think there are complications with that , anyone care to chime in?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Procol</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:07:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13114793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;switching subjects to an old fave, C and the preferred conversion/synthetics. a huge slug of preferreds are finally getting converted to common, I believe by Jul 29. ratio is still x7.3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So... the Pfd AA (listed as C-PP by most brokers, go figure) is going to convert, fully. it's gradually risen to close the arb gap over last few weeks, trading around 19-19.50. conversion with C at 2.70 is 19.70. no muss, no fuss.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;today C-PP opens below 10, and then moves to around 16. at noon it's still about 20% below conversion that is happening within a week. wtf?? implies a 2.20 price on the common in 5 days, which I suppose is possible, but all the arbs shorting the common vs the pref would be covering, no?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a small C-PP position and will see what I get. maybe 4 seats at CitiField as compensation? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anysunday</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13111434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lmao, good words of wisdom&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:06:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13111287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I was actually WORKING in the business, and my 7 and 24s were still worth more than the paper they were written on, I was in a meeting with one of the "old wise men" of the firm. Someone remarked that market had hit bottom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The old wise man remarked (think Gandolf with a buzz cut):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Don't ever think it can't get any higher, because it can. And don't ever think it can't get any lower. Because it can."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alas, like most words of wisdom, the import is existential, not actionable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, I'm selling spreads as the words echo in my head.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karlk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:03:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13110239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, not a bad idea. Certainly a great time also if you have a win on a straight stock long to switch it to a call long.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:49:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mourning Volatility</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/mourning-volatility.html#comment-13109965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of good observations here. Personally, I'm using the low volatility to do that other thing with options, you know, use them to hedge.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlie Lefaux</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:45:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>