<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Daily Options Report - Latest Comments in The OCC</title><link>http://daily-options-report.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://daily-options-report.disqus.com/the_occ/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:06:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The OCC</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2008/09/occ.html#comment-2734831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;nice explanation. And they truly didn't seem to understand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:06:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OCC</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2008/09/occ.html#comment-2734628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So when people hedge by using derivates and then saw the oil drop $50 per barrel did they think about looking down another barrel?  &lt;a href="http://nomedals.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="nomedals.blogspot.com"&gt;nomedals.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:52:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OCC</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2008/09/occ.html#comment-2732028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes. My favorite is the "shock" that the self-regulation didn't work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:05:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OCC</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2008/09/occ.html#comment-2731598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;  Let's face it, massive deregulation is only an excuse to behave badly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Anyone that doesn't get that is a nitwit&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Procol</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:32:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OCC</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2008/09/occ.html#comment-2730167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, and it's just a silly argument. You can have flexible contracts with more oversight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:54:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OCC</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2008/09/occ.html#comment-2730155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;even then you'll find out you own WaMu paper, lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:52:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OCC</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2008/09/occ.html#comment-2729627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In 1998, the CFTC wanted to implement oversight of OTC derivatives and create an OCC type clearing system.  The Committee to Save the World -- Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and Alan Greenspan -- along with Arthur Levitt of the SEC, were all vociferously against it.  They said that by forcing companies to have standardized contracts instead of custom contracts, the US would lose its position of financial leadership to overseas markets like London and Asia.  That was the end of it.  The US did NOT lose its leadership position.  Too bad.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Listen, I want a deregulated market as much as anybody else.  But I do NOT want deregulation at the expense of counterparty integrity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:57:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OCC</title><link>http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2008/09/occ.html#comment-2723217</link><description>&lt;p&gt; The only innocuous position in this market is sitting on a beach in the Bahamas.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Procol</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:10:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>